Papermaking furnish comprising solventless cationic polymer retention aid combined with phenolic resin and polyethylene oxide

ABSTRACT

A papermaking furnish is provided with a phenolic resin/polyethylene oxide retention system in combination with a solventless cationic polymer retention aid which increases retention rate and drainage in the paper sheet. The retention aid may be added to the furnish together with the phenolic resin or separately from it at a different point of addition. It can also be used for pretreating a filler which is added to the furnish.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to papermaking. More particularly, it relates to a papermaking furnish that comprises a solventless cationic polymer retention aid in combination with phenolic resin and polyethylene oxide (PEO) to increase retention and/or drainage in the furnish.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the manufacture of paper, an aqueous suspension of cellulosic fibers, optionally containing a filler and cationic starch, as well as other papermaking chemicals, is spread over a wire or cloth and water is removed therefrom to form a fiber web or sheet. Such aqueous suspension or slurry is called “papermaking furnish”. The removal of water or dewatering of the furnish as well as retention of fines, fillers and other papermaking chemicals in the paper sheet are very important to the efficient recovery and production rate and to the cost of manufacture of the paper and its quality.

It is well known to use a combination of phenolic resin and polyethylene oxide as a flocculent to improve retention and drainage in the production of paper and paperboard, particularly in newsprint applications where mechanical pulp containing dissolved organic contaminants causes some detrimental effects. In such systems, the phenolic resin is usually added first to the furnish, before the last shear point, such as a fan pump, and PEO is added second, usually near the headbox of the paper machine, in order to minimize shear. As is known, shearing is provided by one or more of the cleaning, mixing and pumping stages in the papermaking process and the shear breaks down the flocks formed by the high molecular weight polymer into microflocs, which are further agglomerated, for instance with the help of cationic starch.

It has been suggested that the mechanism of the phenolic resin/PEO two-component retention system consists firstly of adsorption of the phenolic resin onto fibers and fines, followed by attachment of PEO to the phenolic hydroxyl groups of the resin, forming high molecular weight polymeric networks which serve to retain the fines and also promote drainage. Examples of such two-component retention system are disclosed, for instance, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,070,236 and 5,472,570.

The phenolic resin/PEO two-component system has the advantage of being independent of most dissolved and colloidal contaminants in the water circuit because it functions by a hydrogen-bonding mechanism. In contrast, cationic polyacrylamides, which are also commonly used as retention aids, are adversely affected by dissolved and colloidal contaminants found in mechanical pulp.

In addition, the phenolic resin/PEO two-component system has several other advantages over cationic polyamides, including more favorable effects on the final sheet formation and a better pitch control, which refers to its ability to fix organic contaminants in the paper sheet rather than allowing them to deposit on the mill fabrics and machinery, thereby causing eventual shutdowns.

Nevertheless, despite the above advantages, the phenolic resin/PEO retention and drainage system has not been adopted in mills producing grades such as highly filled specialty mechanical paper, fine paper (where mechanical pulp from softwood does not form a large part of the furnish), and tissue and packaging papers. In these areas, cationic polyacrylamides are the predominant treatment.

The main reason for the lack of success of the phenolic resin/PEO system in the above areas is the reduced performance owing to the lack of organic contaminants in these furnishes compared to the softwood mechanical pulp used in many newsprint applications. These contaminants provide a part of the network mechanism by which this retention system functions and their absence in other furnishes such as sulphate pulp and recycled and deinked pulp has led to the predominance of other retention systems, especially cationic polyacrylamides. In addition it has been found that residual silicate in the pulp from some bleaching and de-inking operations sometimes has an adverse effect on polyethylene oxide causing a loss of retention or drainage. (c.f. Rahman and Tay Tappi Proceedings, 1986 Papermakers Conference, p 189-198).

There is thus a need for an improved phenolic resin/PEO based retention system that would alleviate the above mentioned disadvantages and increase retention and drainage, particularly in furnishes such as sulphide pulp and recycled and de-inked pulp.

OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Is is an object of the present invention to provide a papermaking furnish with increased retention rate and drainage based on the phenolic resin/PEO retention system.

A further object is to provide a method of increasing retention rate and drainage in a papermaking furnish while also maintaining good sheet quality at reduced cost.

A still further object is to provide a papermaking furnish based on the phenolic resin/PEO retention system which would be suitable for producing highly filled specialty mechanical paper, fine paper and tissue and packaging papers.

Other objects and advantages will become apparent from the following description of the invention.

The applicants have surprisingly discovered that a retention aid consisting of a solventless cationic polymer, which is in the form of an oil-free, water-soluble polymeric dispersion, combined with phenolic resin, such as phenol formaldehyde resin, provides increased retention rate and drainage as well as other advantages, such as reduced cost, when used in conjunction with polyethylene oxide (PEO). When the solventless, cationic polymer retention aid and phenolic resin are added to the furnish, they form a structure which gives a significantly improved reaction with polyethylene oxide when it is added to the furnish. Retention, namely fiber retention, filler retention, and COD-retention (natural resins and other organic contaminants) and drainage are increased to the extent that the above areas of fine paper, recycle packaging grades and other types of paper production become viable areas when this system is used. Additionally increased filler and fines retention is obtained over that which would be achievable using the PEO and phenolic resin combination alone or using the solventless cationic polymer alone.

The solventless, cationic polymer retention aids suitable for the purposes of the present invention are characterizied by the fact that they do not contain any oil-phase. They are liquid, aqueous, solventless dispersions of cationic polymers with typical charge densities of between 20 and 75% mole percent, solids content between 2 and 70%, and viscosities in water at 1% of between 2000 and 20000 mPa sec.

The synthesis of such polymeric dispersions is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,480,934 where it is also indicated that they can be used as a retention agent in paper production, as a soil improvement agent or as a dispersing agent. However, no suggestion is made in this patent that they could be employed as a component of the phenolic resin/PEO system, resulting in the above mentioned advantages.

The solventless cationic polymer retention aid and phenolic resin may enter the furnish separately at two different points of addition or together at the same point of addition, i.e. they can be used in sequence or together, and their combination reacts much more favourably with PEO than if either component is used alone. The solventless cationic polymer retention aid and the phenolic resin can be added to the furnish either before or after PEO addition.

Solventless cationic polymers are suitable for the purposes of the present invention regardless of the number, type or concentration of the monomers used to make them and they can be in the form of a liquid or dried to a powder. Examples of such polymers are those marketed by Degussa under trade names Praestaret K-325 and Praestaret K-350 as well as Praestol E-125 and Praestor E-150.

Thus, the present invention provides a papermaking furnish comprising a combination of a solventless cationic polymer retention aid with phenolic resin and polyethylene oxide, as a retention system for retaining fines, fillers and other papermaking chemicals in the paper sheet.

In a preferred application, the amount of the solventless cationic retention aid is 0.05 kg/ton to 10 kg/ton based on the weight of dry fibers; the amount of phenolic resin is 0.05 kg/ton to 10 kg/ton of actual resin in the as-supplied material per ton of dry fibers; and the amount of polyethylene oxide is 5 g/ton to 500 g/ton based on the weight of dry fibers, the “ton” being a metric tonne.

The preferred ratio of solventless cationic polymer retention aid to phenolic resin is from 200:1 to 1:200; that of phenolic resin to PEO from 100:1 to 1:100 and that of solventless cationic polymer retention aid to PEO is from 1:2000 to 2000:1.

The invention also includes a method of increasing retention rate and drainage in a papermaking furnish by adding to the furnish an effective amount of a solventless cationic polymer retention aid in combination with phenolic resin and polyethylene oxide. The effective amount will depend on the type of pulp being dewatered and on the other additives being used. It can readily be established by trial and error before establishing the appropriate amount for a given furnish. The preferred amounts are those already indicated above.

In a further embodiment of the present invention, it has been found that a further increase in sheet drainage and machine speed are achieved when the solventless cationic polymer retention agent is added last, after the PEO addition and after the last point of shear.

In a still further embodiment of this invention, the filler is pretreated with the solventless cationic polymer retention aid before it is added to the stock. This pretreatment is a preflocculation approach and it results in a better dispersion of the filler throughout the stock, better fines/filler retention and better opacifying properties. The pretreated filler is dosed into the stock before the last point of shear and the PEO is preferably dosed near the head box, thus capturing the filler particles as well as other fines and fibers in an apparent network structure.

In summary, this invention utilizes the synergism between the phenolic resin and the solventless cationic polymer retention aid to enhance the performance with polyethylene oxide and to allow the use of polyethylene oxide and phenolic resin in a wider range of applications, as well as improving existing newsprint applications. Furthermore, the synergistic phenolic resin/solventless cationic polymer retention aid combination gives further beneficial effects if the solventless cationic polymer retention aid is premixed with the filler prior to dosing into the stock and reaction with polyethylene oxide. These effects have been confirmed with acidic and neutral furnishes and a variety of fillers including kaolin, calcite, bentonite and titanium dioxide.

The practice of this invention enables the benefits of polyethylene oxide to be realized in more papermaking applications than is possible at present. These benefits include a more favourable sheet formation than that produced by polyacrylamide retention agents, an ability to fix pitch contaminants in the sheet and the generally lower dosage rate than with polyacrylamide systems, leading to potentially lower steam consumption in the driers because of the smaller amount of bound water. Other benefits obtained by the practice of this invention are its favourable reaction with starch, and its ability to provide a superior flocculating pretreatment of the filler in order that the activated filler be more fully dispersed throughout the stock prior to its capture by the addition of the polyethylene oxide component. The provision of a superior flocculating pretreatment of the filler allows the filler to attain its best opacifying power while at the same time its capture by polyethylene oxide ensures good filler retention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an arrangement in which the solventless polymer and the phenolic resin are introduced together into the papermaking furnish;

FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of an arrangement in which the solventless polymer and the phenolic resin are introduced separately from one another into the papermaking furnish;

FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of an arrangement in which the solventless polymer is added last into the papermaking furnish; and

FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of an arrangement in which the filler is pretreated with the solventless polymer.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention will now be described with reference to the appended drawings which illustrate some preferred embodiments thereof and in which the same elements are identified by the same reference numbers.

Thus, FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic arrangement of a papermaking process in which the fan pump 10 forms the last point of shear after which the furnish proceeds to the screen 12 and from. the screen to the headbox 14. In this embodiment, the solventless polymer and the phenolic resin are introduced together into the furnish between the fan pump 10 and the screen 12 before the introduction of PEO.

According to the embodiment of FIG. 2, the solventless polymer is added to the furnish in advance of the fan pump 10 and prior to the introduction of the phenolic resin and PEO which are added between the fan pump 10 and the screen 12. The solventless polymer is added here as a fiber pretreatment micropolymer.

In the embodiment of FIG. 3, the solventless polymer is added last after the screen 12 and just in advance of the headbox 14. It acts here as a drainage aid.

Finally, in the embodiment of FIG. 4, the solventless polymer is added as a filler pretreatment in advance of the fan pump 10. Here, the phenolic resin is also added in advance of the fan pump 10, but after the pretreated filler. PEO is added between the fan pump 10 and the screen 12.

It should be noted that the illustrated arrangements are in no way limitative.

EXAMPLES

To test the various features of the present invention described above, the following laboratory test procedures were used.

For retention without pad formation and turbidity tests a Dynamic drainage jar (DDJ) was used with a baffled cylinder and the speed of the stirrer was set at between 500 and 1000 rpm.

For retention with pad formation, drainage, and formation tests a Dynamic Drainage Analyzer (DDA) was used. The objective in using the DDA was to be able to come as close to papermaking conditions as possible. The DDA is conceived to measure drainage rates through a forming pad. As a result, the measured retention is higher than that obtained using the dynamic drainage jar (DDJ), where no pad is formed. Since a pad is formed in the experiment, the formation of the formed wet sheet can also be obtained.

Drainage

Drainage in the DDA is measured as the time from the start of the run until air starts being sucked through the sheet and it is automatically computed to within one hundredth of a second. The drainage is affected by many factors, for example grammage, vacuum, sample volume, type of stock, temperature, wire, and chemicals. It is usually desirable to use the same furnish consistency as in the mill. However, for furnishes with high freeness and fast drainage it can improve the experimental accuracy if a higher solids content or larger sample volume is used. The opposite is true of a low freeness furnish.

Retention

Retention is defined as the amount of fiber retained on the wire compared to the amount of fiber going through. The retention in DDA experiments is inherently higher than on a paper machine. However, it correlates very well with the values found with a Britt jar.

The present invention will be illustrated by the following examples, however, without being restricted thereto.

Example 1

A 1.06% cellulosic fibre slurry consisting of 50% TMP (thermo mechanical pulp-hydrosulfonate bleached), 20% DIP (de-inked pulp) and 30% broke was taken from a newsprint mill. The slurry had a clay filler content of 20%. The pH of the slurry was set at 4.5.

For retention and turbidity tests a Dynamic drainage jar (DDJ) was used with a baffled cylinder and the speed of the stirrer was set at 550 rpm. A 500 ml sample was used for testing. FPR indicates the first pass retention.

For drainage, formation, and retention (with pad formation) tests a Dynamic Drainage Analyzer (DDA) was used with a baffled cylinder and the speed of the stirrer was set at 1000 rpm. A 800 ml sample was used for testing. The vacuum was set at 500 mBar.

Tables 1 and 2 below show the results when conventional phenol formaldehyde resin-polyethylene oxide retention system is compared to phenol formaldehyde resin-polyethylene oxide-solventless cationic polymer flocculant retention system. In the tables the turbidity is indicated in nephelometric turbidity units (ntu). TABLE 1 DDJ TESTING Normalizied Product Product Product Product Product Product Retention Turbidity Cost Name Dose (g/t) Name Dosage (g/t) Name Dosage (g/t) (%) ntu (0 to 100) Blank 0 0 0 0 0 43.58% 285 0 Solventless Polymer Flocculant added before phenolic resin and PEO solventless, 200 phenolic 240 polyethylene 30 45.85% 275 36.4 cationic 400 resin 240 oxide 30 46.02% 249 52.3 polymer 600 240 30 46.33% 256.5 68.2 retention 800 240 30 46.50% 229.5 84.0 aid 1000 240 30 46.83% 227 100.0 Solventless Polymer Flocculant added after phenolic resin and PEO phenolic 240 Polyethylene 30 solventless, 200 45.08% 246.5 36.4 resin 240 oxide 30 cationic 400 45.27% 247 52.3 240 30 polymer 600 45.88% 236 68.2 240 30 retention aid 800 47.17% 235 84.1 240 30 1000 47.36% 234.5 100.0 Solventless Polymer Flocculant added between phenolic resin and PEO phenolic 240 Solventless, 200 polyethylene 30 45.90% 249.5 36.4 resin 240 cationic 400 oxide 30 45.89% 249 52.3 240 polymer 600 30 46.24% 243.5 68.2 240 retention aid 800 30 46.30% 229 84.1 240 1000 30 46.34% 222 100.0 phenolic resin and PEO alone solventless, 0 phenolic 240 polyethylene 30 43.95% 242 20.5 cationic 0 resin 480 oxide 60 44.07% 240 40.9 polymer 0 720 90 44.23% 235 61.4 retention 0 960 120 44.55% 231 81.9 aid Solventless Polymer Flocculant alone solventless, 200 phenolic 0 polyethylene 0 42.92% 290 15.9 cationic 400 resin 0 oxide 0 43.62% 290 31.8 polymer 600 0 0 44.22% 288 47.7 retention 800 0 0 45.25% 276 63.6 aid 1000 0 0 46.62% 275 79.5

TABLE 2 DDA TESTING Normalized Product Product Product Product Product Product Retention Drainage Cost Name Dose (g/t) Name Dosage (g/t) Name Dosage (g/t) (%) (sec) (0 to 100) Blank 0 0 0 0 0 76.14 57.50 0 Solventless Polymer Flocculant added before Phenolic resin and PEO solventless, 500 phenolic resin 240 polyethylene 30 78.14 66.26 55.8 cationic 500 800 oxide 100 78.10 66.40 100 polymer 1000 240 30 78.08 64.14 92.6 retention aid Solventless Polymer Flocculant added after Phenolic resin and PEO phenolic 240 polyethylene 30 solventless, 500 77.69 58.94 55.8 resin 480 oxide 60 cationic 500 78.25 58.97 74.7 240 30 polymer 1000 81.70 59.80 92.6 800 100 retention aid 500 83.28 50.32 100.0 Solventless Polymer Flocculant added between Phenolic resin and PEO phenolic 240 solventless, 500 polyethylene 30 78.94 63.63 55.8 resin 240 cationic 1000 oxide 30 78.95 65.20 92.6 polymer retention aid Phenolic resin and PEO alone phenolic resin 240 polyethylene 30 77.86 58.44 19.0 480 oxide 60 80.27 55.47 37.9 800 100 83.38 49.86 63.2 Solventless Polymer alone solventless, 200 phenolic resin 0 polyethylene 0 76.08 57.76 14.7 cationic 400 0 oxide 0 77.32 58.82 29.5 polymer 600 0 0 77.27 55.55 44.2 retention aid 800 0 0 77.28 55.88 58.9 1000 0 0 77.54 58.34 73.6

Example 2

A 0.992% cellulose fibre slurry consisting of 10% Kraft and 90% TMP (thermo mechanical pulp-hydrosulfite bleached) was taken from a specialty newsprint mill. The slurry had a clay filler content of 10%. The pH of the slurry was set at 6.0

For drainage, formation, and retention (with pad formation) tests a Dynamic Drainage Analyzer (DDA) was used with a baffled cylinder and the speed of the stirrer was set at 1000 rpm. A 800 ml sample was used for testing. The vacuum was set at 500 mBar.

Table 3 below shows the results when conventional phenol formaldehyde resin-polyethylene oxide retention system is compared to phenol formaldehyde resin-polyethylene oxide-solventless, cationic polymer flocculant retention system. TABLE 3 DDA TESTING Normalized Product Product Product Product Product Product Retention Drainage Cost Name Dose (g/t) Name Dosage (g/t) Name Dosage (g/t) (%) (sec) (0 to 100) Blank 0 0 0 0 0 78.87 83.93 0 Solventless Polymer Flocculant added before Phenolic resin and PEO Solventless, 350 phenolic 1000 Polyethylene 125 83.99 39.70 83.1 cationic 350 resin 600 oxide 150 83.60 37.20 73.2 polymer 475 700 175 83.40 34.70 89.3 retention aid Phenolic resin and PEO alone phenolic 0 polyethylene 150 81.12 49.60 30.3 resin 1000 oxide 200 82.25 38.20 77.8 1500 150 83.15 45.30 86.4 2000 125 80.61 47.70 100.0 Solventless Polymer alone Solventless, 500 phenolic 0 polyethylene 0 81.50 35.50 29.2 cationic 1000 resin 0 oxide 0 80.88 61.00 58.4 polymer retention aid

Example 3

A 1.12% cellulose fibre slurry consisting of 5% Kraft, 70% TMP (thermo mechanical pulp-hydrosulfite bleached) and 25% deinked pulp (DIP) was taken from a specialty newsprint mill using recycled fibres. The slurry had a clay filler content of 30%. The pH of the slurry was set at 6.2

For retention and turbidity tests a Dynamic drainage jar (DDJ) was used with a baffled cylinder and the speed of the stirrer was set at 550 rpm. A 500 ml sample was used for testing. FPR refers to the first pass retention and FPAR the first pass ash retention.

Table 4 below shows the results when conventional phenol formaldehyde resin-polyethylene oxide retention system is compared to phenol formaldehyde resin-polyethylene oxide-solventless, cationic polymer flocculant retention system. TABLE 4 DDJ TESTING Normalized Product Product Product Product Product Product FPR/FPAR Turbidity Cost Name Dose (g/t) Name Dosage (g/t) Name Dosage (g/t) (%) ntu (0 to 100) Blank 0 0 0 0 0 35.6/45.4 86.1 0 Solventless Polymer Flocculant added before phenolic resin and PEO solventless, 300 phenolic 420 polyethylene 60 46.0/58.2 36.2 97.8 cationic resin oxide polymer retention aid Solventless Polymer Flocculant added after phenolic resin and PEO phenolic 420 polyethylene 60 solventless, 300 42.2/56.5 34.1 97.8 resin oxide cationic polymer retention aid Solventless Polymer Flocculant added between phenolic resin and PEO phenolic 420 solventless, 300 polyethylene 60 45.4/57.9 36.2 97.8 resin cationic oxide polymer retention aid phenolic resin and PEO alone solventless, 0 phenolic 0 polyethylene 60 37.1/47.8 35.7 26.2 cationic resin 420 oxide 60 42.9/54.8 40.7 60.1 polymer 700 100 41.3/43.3 42.6 100.0 retention aid Solventless Polymer Flocculant alone solventless, 300 phenolic 0 polyethylene 0 41.1/43.3 35.2 37.8 cationic resin oxide polymer retention aid

For this same mill, the polymer was tested on the machine. The solventless, cationic flocculant was added before the phenolic resin and PEO (in the thick stock). The table below shows the results when conventional phenol formaldehyde resin-polyethylene oxide retention system is compared to phenol formaldehyde resin-polyethylene oxide-solventless, cationic polymer flocculant retention system. All relevant machine parameters and polymer dosages are tabulated below in Table 5. TABLE 5 MACHINE PARAMETERS - BEFORE AND AFTER ADDITION OF THE SOLVENTLESS CATIONIC POLYMER RETENTION AID. Without solventless With solventless cationic polymer cationic polymer Parameter retention aid retention aid Grade 643.01 643.01 Grammage (g/m²) 41 41 Speed (m/min) 813 855 % De-inked pulp (DIP) 0 0 % Softwood bleached kraft 25.2 25 (SBK) 1st section Steam (kPa) 114 100 2nd section Steam (kPa) 177 210 3rd section Steam (kPa) 273 258 Head Box consistency (%) 1.154 1.02 White water consistency (%) 0.686 0.537 First pass retention (%) 40.66 47.1 Head box ash content (%) 14.87 8.43 White water ash content (%) 21.1 13.23 First pass ash retention (%) 12.3 17.44 % of ash in the sheet 3 2.3 % of alphatex clay added to 2.01 1.89 headbox Cationic demand (me/l) 286 213 Headbox turbidity (ntu) 121 43 White water turbidity (ntu) 90 32 Solventless cationic polymer 0 300 dosage (g/T) Phenolic resin dosage (g/T) 560 235 Coagulant dosage (g/T) 210 0 Polyethylene oxide dosage 59 38 (g/T) Cost Decrease (%) — −12.60%

The saving of 12.60% in the cost of production represents a considerable advantage in papermaking.

The above results clearly indicate that the solventless cationic polymer-phenolic resin-PEO combination is the best system to use based on relative costs. The retention systems using the phenolic resin/PEO in combination with the solventless cationic polymer yield the highest DDJ and DDA fines retention, the lowest turbidities and the best drainage rate—a clear indication of the programs ability to retain fines and colloidal substances. This is especially true for the following addition sequence: solventless cationic polymer/phenolic resin/polyethylene oxide. In contrast the solventless cationic polymer or the phenolic resin/polyethylene oxide system used alone result in lower retentions and/or higher turbidities.

From these results it can be concluded that not only is there a synergy between the phenolic resin/PEO system and the solventless cationic polymer, but also that it is the most cost effective system.

It should be noted that this invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described and exemplified above, but that various modification obvious to those skilled in the art can be made without departing from the invention and the scope of the following claims. 

1. A papermaking furnish comprising a combination of a flocculating solventless cationic polymer retention aid with phenolic resin and polyethylene oxide as a retention system for retaining fines, fillers and other papermaking chemicals in the paper sheet, characterized in that the flocculating solventless cationic polymer retention aid is a liquid, aqueous, solventless dispersion of a cationic polymer, without any oil-phase, having viscosities in water at 1% of between 2000 and 20.000 mPa sec.
 2. (canceled)
 3. A papermaking furnish according to claim 1, in which said dispersion has a charge density of between 20 and 75 mole % and a solids content of between 2 and 70 wt %.
 4. A papermaking furnish according to claim 1, in which the amount of the solventless cationic retention aid is 0.05 kg/ton to 10 kg/ton based on the weight of dry fibers; the amount of phenolic resin is 0.05 kg/ton to 10 kg/ton of actual resin in as supplied material per ton of dry fibers; and the amount of polyethylene oxide is 5 g/ton to 500 g/ton based on the weight of dry fibers.
 5. A papermaking furnish according to any one of claim 1, in which the ratio of the solventless cationic retention aid to the phenolic resin is from 200:1 to 1:200; the ratio of the phenolic resin to polyethylene oxide is from 100:1 to 1:100 and the ratio of the solventless cationic polymer retention aid to polyethylene oxide is from 1:2000 to 2000:1.
 6. A method of increasing retention rate and/or drainage in a papermaking furnish comprising adding to the furnish an effective amount of a liquid, aqueous solventless cationic polymer flocculating retention aid having viscosities in water at 1% of between 2000 and 20.000 mPa sec in combination with phenolic resin and polyethylene oxide.
 7. A method according to claim 6, in which the solventless cationic polymer retention aid is added to the furnish together with the phenolic resin at the same point of addition.
 8. A method according to claim 6, in which the solventless cationic polymer retention aid is added to the furnish separately from the phenolic resin at a different point of addition.
 9. A method according to claim 6 in which the solventless cationic polymer retention aid and the phenolic resin are added to the furnish before or after the polyethylene oxide addition.
 10. A method according to claim 8, in which the solventless cationic polymer retention aid is added last, after the phenolic resin and polyethylene addition and after the last point of shear.
 11. A method according to claim 6, further comprising adding a filler to the furnish and pretreating said filler with the solventless cationic polymer retention aid.
 12. A method as claimed in claim 11, in which the pretreated filler is dosed into the furnish before the last point of shear and before addition of the polyethylene oxide. 